New ways with old numbers
Tim Harford discusses in FT.com the problems of quantifying impact of any research:
The quality of a piece of research is subjective, and using measures such as the number of peer-reviewed articles published simply outsources the subjective judgment to somebody else. But there is a deeper problem: in a complex world, it is impossible for anyone to judge what the significance of a research breakthrough might eventually be.
Categories: newspapers, Opinion pieces
Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
Leave a comment
Trackback